Home

 

 

   Links

Pharmaceuticals


 Bibliography

Overview

In 1992, when Paxil hit the market, it faced a seemingly uphill battle to wrest customers from older SSRIs such as Prozac and Zoloft. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration had approved Paxil for the treatment of depression, like those drugs. But its manufacturer, SmithKline Beecham (because of a 2001 merger, now GlaxoSmithKline), was more interested in positioning Paxil as a remedy for anxiety disorders…

The company quickly secured permission to market Paxil for the treatment of panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. By mid-1995, Paxil had become the fastest-growing SSRI in the United States. In 1996, sales of the drug had climbed 54 percent to $291 million.

Impressive though those numbers may be, SmithKline was on the verge of a much bigger marketing coup: The company had been working to win approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to market Paxil as a treatment for the first of a series of little-known mental health ills. In 1999, the FDA agreed to allow Paxil's prescription for the previously rare "social anxiety disorder."

SmithKline hired a New York public relations firm to raise awareness about the syndrome. According to the trade journal PR News, Cohn & Wolfe "developed a plan to educate reporters, consumers, and, in some cases, physicians, in an effort to encourage diagnosis and treatment."

All indications are that the agency earned its fee. "Paxil's reintroduction secured nearly 1.1 billion media impressions in 1999, with 400 million generated in the month that the drug was granted FDA approval," raved PR News. "Media highlights included the cover of U.S. News and World Report, The Howard Stern Show, Parade, National Examiner, the New York Times, Good Morning America, and Vogue. Ninety-six percent of media coverage delivered the key message, 'Paxil is the first and only FDA-approved medication for the treatment of social anxiety disorder.'"

Paxil is Forever by Beth Hawkins, 16 October 2002.


There is a close relationship between the drug companies and the psychiatric establishment. While it may not be the intention, the establishment explanation of the causes of and solutions to schizophrenia are crucial components in the process of selling drugs. If patients can be persuaded their illness is an unchangeable genetic destiny and that it is a physical problem requiring a physical solution, drug companies' profits will grow.

Think again by Oliver James, 22 October 2005.


In October, 2004, after taking TeenScreen, a 10-minute computer test developed in the psychiatric department of Columbia University, 16-year-old Chelsea Rhoades of Indiana was told she had two mental health problems, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and social anxiety disorder. The diagnoses were based upon Chelsea's responses that she liked to help clean the house and didn't "party" much… TeenScreen is designed only to increase psychiatric and drug company revenues by turning normal children into lifelong mental patients. Now is the time for anyone who cares about children and the future to step up and demand that mental health screening not be allowed in any schools at any time.

Inside TeenScreen by Sandra Lucas, 30 December 2005.


The cruel contradictions of corporate medicine were described matter-of-factly in the New York Times's Jan. 9-12 series on diabetes. Hospitals lose money educating patients on how to control the disease and make money on amputations and other procedures required as the disease worsens. One in eight adult New Yorkers now suffers from diabetes, as do some 21 million Americans.

"Metabolic Syndrome" is to "Clinical Depression" as Acomplia is Prozac by Fred Gardner, 21 January 2006.

 

Featured Links

Internal Links 
*Paxil is Forever by Beth Hawkins, 16 October 2002. “It was like getting off crack, for chrissakes.”
*Think again by Oliver James, 22 October 2005.
*Inside TeenScreen by Sandra Lucas, 30 December 2005.
*"Metabolic Syndrome" is to "Clinical Depression" as Acomplia is Prozac by Fred Gardner, 21 January 2006. “”

Further Reading

Internal LinksExternal Links
*Foregone conclusions by Richard Smith, 14 January 2004. “The public is being regularly deceived by the drug trials funded by pharmaceutical companies, loaded to generate the results they need.”
*The Truth About the Drug Companies by Marcia Angell, 15 July 2004.
*Suicide, violence linked with Prozac from Xinhuanet, 01 January 2005.
*But the Pills Your Mother Gives You... by Alexander Cockburn, 02 April 2005. “Death, Depression and Prozac.”
*Licensed to Ill by Bradford Plumer, 25 July 2005. “Increasingly, drug companies aren't just selling cures. They're also marketing disease.”
*Medicare drug disaster by Chris Murphy, 27 January 2006. “The great hidden scandal in Washington is the disastrous debut of the Medicare prescription drug benefit.”
*The New Robber Barons by Peter Rost, 09 February 2006. “The pharmaceutical industry spends over $100 million on lobbying activities to stop lower drug prices, according to the Center for Public Integrity. There are 1,274 registered pharmaceutical lobbyists in Washington, D.C. and during the 2004 election cycle, the drug industry contributed $1 million to President Bush.”
*An Ex-Pfizer VP Takes on Big Pharma: Peter Rost vs. Goliath by Evelyn Pringle, 10 May 2006.
*"Most Wanted" Corporate Human Rights Violators of 2005 from Global Exchange. “Pfizer also values shareholder profits over safety standards.”
*Why Not Jeb and W.'s Kids First? by Evelyn Pringle, 12 March 2005. “Citing recommendations by the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (NFC), Bush wants to launch a nationwide mental illness screening program in government institutions, including the public school system, for all students from kindergarten up to the 12th grade.”
*The War on Us by Fred Gardner, 25 November 2006. “The damage wreaked by products and procedures foisted on the American people by pharmaceutical and "health care" corporations is incalculable. This week the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study showing that 300,000 unnecessary back surgeries are performed each year. The gratuitous operations are sold by surgeons on the basis of a flat-out lie, i.e., that doing nothing can result in permanent nerve damage and possible loss of bowel or bladder control. No such outcomes were reported in the large study led by James Weinstein, MD, a professor of orthopedic surgery at Dartmouth.”
*Sanity's shining light by Oliver James, 19 December 2006. “Through their unwitting lapdogs – the psychiatric establishment and geneticists – drug companies teach that emotional distress is a chemical destiny only alterable by pills.”
* WorstPills.org. “Your expert, independent source for prescription drug information”
*Drug Lobby Second to None: How the pharmaceutical industry gets its way in Washington by M. Asif Ismail, 07 July 2005.
*Drugmakers go furthest to sway Congress by Jim Drinkard, 06 February 2005.
* A Collection of Articles on Disease Mongering from PLoS Medicine. “Disease mongering is the selling of sickness that widens the boundaries of illness and grows the markets for those who sell and deliver treatments. It is exemplified most explicitly by many pharmaceutical industry-funded disease-awareness campaigns – more often designed to sell drugs than to illuminate or to inform or educate about the prevention of illness or the maintenance of health.”
*Teenscreen: A Front Group for the Psycho-Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex from PsychSearch.net, 01 April 2006.
*SSRI Stories. “This website is a collection of 1500+ news stories with the full media article available, mainly criminal in nature, that have appeared in the media or that were part of FDA testimony in either 1991, 2004 or 2006, in which antidepressants are mentioned.”

Text version for printing.

For more articles and links on related topics see
Multinational Corporations and Globalization/Issues